This executive order on AI seems to completely miss the mark, in my opinion. Not a word about holding model providers accountable for training their models on unlicensed data sets, which is the most critical issue at the moment.
Jonathan's location at time of posting:
Comments (4)
SC
Scott Francis
via
infosec.exchange
@jonathan @vmbrasseur it’s definitely An Issue, but I don’t know if it’s The Issue. There are other aspects of unregulated AI that pose more significant risk to people (as opposed to business models). I definitely think it should be addressed, and not having it in there was a gap, but I could see the reasoning being “this will get challenged for sure, better punt to Congress”
WE
Web user
via
BlueSky
I've had so many conversations with the AI folks (I am AI folk) about this issue. I hate to generalize, but they just don't want to listen. I avoid posting my art because I don't want it ending up in dataset making VCs rich. The response is always, "get with the times." Little respect for control.
WE
Web user
via
BlueSky
The VCs and founders reply with "this is what a search engine does". The AI users tell you to get with the times. They don't want to hear "it's a choice you make to scrape." I'm super lucky that I'm not dependent on income from my painting because professional artists are really stuck right now.
JO
Jonathan LaCour
via
BlueSky
Indeed, I think there are very few "adults in the room" when it comes to AI. As an AWS partner, I get a lot of insight into their take on AI, and I have to say, they're approaching it the right way. Their data sets are carefully curated and they want to build in things like automatic attribution.
Comments (4)
@jonathan @vmbrasseur it’s definitely An Issue, but I don’t know if it’s The Issue. There are other aspects of unregulated AI that pose more significant risk to people (as opposed to business models). I definitely think it should be addressed, and not having it in there was a gap, but I could see the reasoning being “this will get challenged for sure, better punt to Congress”
I've had so many conversations with the AI folks (I am AI folk) about this issue. I hate to generalize, but they just don't want to listen. I avoid posting my art because I don't want it ending up in dataset making VCs rich. The response is always, "get with the times." Little respect for control.
The VCs and founders reply with "this is what a search engine does". The AI users tell you to get with the times. They don't want to hear "it's a choice you make to scrape." I'm super lucky that I'm not dependent on income from my painting because professional artists are really stuck right now.
Indeed, I think there are very few "adults in the room" when it comes to AI. As an AWS partner, I get a lot of insight into their take on AI, and I have to say, they're approaching it the right way. Their data sets are carefully curated and they want to build in things like automatic attribution.